Against Nostalgia (Part 2)

Despite being the worst of the original trilogy of Indiana Jones, Temple of Doom was the one that I remember watching the most as a kid.  As an adult I could construct a complicated rationale for this about my relative levels of comfort with face melting, heart ripping, and rapid desiccation of a live body (these movies are gruesome), but the reality is probably more simple: I could never find the Raiders of the Lost Ark video in my parents’ house when I was a kid, so Temple of Doom was my first exposure to the colonialist action hero.  Still, you’d think that the heart scene would be the most iconic thing I remember about Temple of Doom, but it isn’t; the bridge scene is.

There’s a moment in the course of the escape from the Thuggee cult where Indy and his companions find themselves trapped on a rope bridge between two groups of cultists.  One of them steps forward to confront the hero with pair of swords that he wields with expert menace.  Smugly, Indy reaches for his holster to realize that he’s long since lost the pistol he normally carries.  Another solution will have to be found.  It’s a weird moment that follows a series of beats that don’t make sense in the context of story.  So many things have happened since Indy was last fully prepared for action with his standard adventurer’s gear that it’s ridiculous he’d suddenly think, “Oh, I’ll just use my gun now.”  If you’re a person who has seen Raiders of the Lost Ark, you get the meta joke that Spielberg and Lucas decided to make here: Indy, when previously confronted with a dangerous assailant who is obviously better versed in some kind of hand-to-hand combat during that earlier adventure, decided to take the most expedient route to victory, and here he can’t pull the same maneuver even though he’d like to.  The reason it’s a meta joke and not a plausible character beat is that Temple of Doom is set five years before Raiders of the Lost Ark.  That earlier success hasn’t happened yet, so it’s bizarre that Indy acts like he knows the solution to this absurd problem and then is bewildered to find it won’t work this time.  The audience, if they’ve seen the first movie, can find the moment delightful, but they have to do some extra labor that should have been on the filmmakers in order to get a comprehensible reading of the character off the chronological order of events.

In short, Indy going for his gun and comically failing to have it is a bit of pure fan service.  It’s silly and nonsensical and even inconsequential in comparison to many of Temple of Doom‘s other sins (or even the litany of problems with the concept of Indiana Jones in general), but it acts as a moment of prioritizing audience delight over building a meaningful and coherent story.  Its foundation is the idea that folks will get a kick out of the filmmakers nudging them and whispering, “Remember that bit you liked in the last movie?  Here it is again with a twist!”  It’s fine in small doses, but overindulgence just leaves you with an empty feeling after the fact, like stuffing your face with Christmas cookies and getting caught up in a sugar fugue.

Star Wars The Rise of Skywalker poster.jpg

The Rise of Skywalker Theatrical Poster (Image credit: Wikipedia)

That’s pretty much the entirety of The Rise of Skywalker.  If you were to take the hundred and fifty minute runtime and chunk it up into individual thirty second nuggets, any one of them alone might be delightful.  Instead, we get to reenact the bit from The Simpsons where Ned-Flanders-as-the-devil tries to punish Homer with endless donuts.  Your mileage may vary as to whether you are Homer or someone who doesn’t have an unlimited appetite for sweet treats.  I, for one, said with all seriousness this past week, “Please don’t offer me anymore cake,” so you can guess how I feel about this last Star War in general terms.

I have spent the intervening weeks between seeing The Rise of Skywalker and working on this post thinking and on and off about what irks me so much about the film.  I can’t say it makes me angry precisely; the Discourse of Star Wars has become largely tiresome in the last few years; it’s just not fun to discuss the creative choices being made with these movies, largely because people take it so seriously.  I’m guilty of this myself (see the first part of this series); that doesn’t mean I find conversations about storytelling choices boring in general (quite the contrary), but I think I’m reaching a point in my life where I’m learning to let go of the more toxic aspects of enthusiastic fandom.  Stories are absolutely important to a person’s sense of identity, and the corporatization of a particular mythology doesn’t make it any less impactful for the people who see vital reflections in it; however, I’m just not there with Star Wars anymore, and I suspect a large part of that jading is the fandom itself.  I was so irritated with the negative response to The Last Jedi two years ago because it promised so much potential for new kinds of stories in the Star Wars movies wrapped up in a very simple theme: The Force is for everyone.  It was such an invitation!

Two years later, I’m still in love with the ideas and execution of The Last Jedi as a movie and as an entry in the flagship series of the Star Wars mythos.  It grapples with a lot of the complexities that are supposed to be present in warfare.  The Resistance is justified in its fight against the First Order (because they’re Nazis, and you always fight against Nazis), but there is no glory in the application of violence to achieve a worthy goal.  People suffer, families are ripped apart, and it’s typically the most morally bankrupt who stand to make the most profit from any kind of armed conflict.  Balanced against that very frank look at the guts of warfare that hero narratives so often gloss over is this extended meditation on interconnection as the very stuff of the Force; Rose Tico’s observation that hope lies in saving what we love instead of destroying what we hate reflects back what Luke has been banging his head trying to explain to Rey in the grumpiest way possible perfectly.  Anyone can participate in this grand thing, and the way we do that is seeking out things to love.

At this point, I think it’s gradually seeped into the general consciousness that Disney as a profit seeking entity decided to change course from all these radical reimaginings of what the Star Wars universe could be about because they feared the backlash against The Last Jedi impacting their bottom line with the final episode of their trilogy.  Sort of secondary to that big idea is the understanding that Star Wars has become a cultural touchstone which is predisposed to turning into a battleground for our ongoing culture wars.  Folks across the political spectrum want to be able to lay claim to it because there’s cultural cachet attached that can steer broader popular sentiment.  I’m fully aware that this phenomenon is one of the driving reasons I adore The Last Jedi and feel generally apathetic towards Rise of Skywalker before we even get into issues of story structure and plotting.  I could easily rant about the regression of this movie’s politics from radical inclusivity to another played out story about genetic destiny and uncritical cheerleading about war.  That stuff’s all there, and it irritates me if I think too hard about it.  What’s more interesting to discuss is the impetus for these changes in sentiment.

It comes back to nostalgia.

Nostalgia is an inherently conservative force in the makeup of the human condition.  It’s the feeling that we chase when we realize that things have gotten more complicated than we would like them to be; it’s an effective way to soothe anxiety about the ever changing state of the universe around us.  There’s comfort to be had in memory.  When William F Buckley coined his infamous characterization of conservatism as someone standing athwart history and shouting stop, he was directly appealing to nostalgia and suggesting that there might be a way to actually achieve the feeling it promises to people who pursue it.  It’s the core thing that drives people who hoard power to stomp on people who demand that power be shared among everyone.  It’s an obsession with rule by the old order reduced to the pettiness of small slights.

In The Rise of Skywalker, Rey finds herself confronted with her lineage: Emperor Palpatine is her grandfather, and for vague reasons this is a major catalyst for her temptation to submit to the Dark Side of the Force.  The intended subtext is that there’s something about the Palpatine family that is inherently predisposed to rage and passion and fear; apparently genetics matter way more than upbringing and social support systems in this version of Star Wars.  In the end, Rey rejects this proposition in favor of choosing the heritage of the Jedi (whom Rise of Skywalker seems to go out of its way to venerate following the serious interrogation that Luke and Yoda did of the tradition in the last movie) and as a cookie for saving the galaxy, she’s given permission by Luke and Leia’s ghosts to claim membership in the Skywalker clan.  Honestly, it’s a dumb, empty plot resolution that only feels emotionally significant because we already know and like most of the Skywalker family.  You can honestly say the same thing for probably ninety percent of the beats in the rest of the movie.  So little about this last adventure is built on new thought or even just realistic character sketching.  It’s nostalgia all the way down.  When Lando shows up to assist the heroes, you go, “Hey, it’s Lando!” and then you move on to a chase scene without actually spending any time with who Lando has become (because there’s been no consideration of how Lando might change after Return of the Jedi).  When Luke shows up as a Force ghost to deliver a pep talk to Rey in her darkest moment (or what passes for a darkest moment) and then raises his old X-Wing out of the ocean so she has a ship to fly to confront Palpatine, you say, “Hey, Luke’s doing a Yoda!” without pondering how he must feel literally resurrecting the symbol of his hotshot glory days so this girl he barely knows can go off to maybe get herself killed in an ill-advised solo mission (Abrams only seems capable of echoing heroic moments from the original trilogy, never the bits about how stupid and rash Luke was at the end of The Empire Strikes Back).  When Chewbacca gets the medal during the final celebration you feel satisfied that that error in the first movie has finally been rectified (never mind that we have no idea what Chewbacca and Lando actually did to warrant that kind of recognition).  The Rise of Skywalker is just a greatest hits compilation that doesn’t actually care about its central characters beyond their capacity to play ersatz versions of the old heroes, and it’s all fueled by the bet that nostalgia is the moneymaker.

At the risk of bumbling into overwrought doomsaying, I find myself growing more and more fearful of the broader pop culture trend towards nostalgic storytelling.  We’re living through some incredibly bad and volatile times, and the impulse to curl up with stories founded on past glories makes total sense.  A lot of comfort is needed.  What I fear is the general stagnation of mass storytelling in response to these needs.  Part of this is rooted in the growing anxiety that our modern mythologies are slowly being rounded up under a single creative umbrella that has no impetus to allow for experimentation and innovation.  The people who stand to make the most money are always the ones who have the fewest qualms about ignoring any kind of principles or ideals, whether those are related to how you tell a story or what ideas you give dignity.  It’s clearly how we’ve gotten two decades of JJ Abrams wandering into established intellectual properties and shouting a bunch while throwing old bits around like so much confetti.  Indy’s going to be reaching for that missing pistol forevermore.

Against Nostalgia (Part 1)

I wrote this essay nearly two years ago in response to both the final chapter of the Life Is Strange series (the first one with Chloe and Max and Rachel) and the release of The Last Jedi.  I had held off on publishing it because I thought I might sell it, but I was naive about the way that freelance writing tends to work.  It’s one of the things I’m most proud of writing, and after having seen The Rise of Skywalker I find myself revisiting the ideas I explored here.

These days, I’m hard pressed to explain what video games I like.  When the subject of gaming inevitably comes up with my students, it’s always a difficult dance of trying to give a comprehensive picture of what I enjoy; my tastes run in cycles through various action-adventure titles to more narratively focused experiences to sometimes just wanting to play a button masher.  About the only solid pieces of information I can give to students are that I don’t do multiplayer games, and I’m typically turned off by traditional first person shooters. It feels like this automatically rules out ninety percent of the games that my students like to play as subjects I can authoritatively discuss, and yet it’s inevitable that I’ll have kids say, “You should play [hot new game of this quarter],” because the desire to connect with someone over a shared interest forever seems to outweigh considerations of personal taste or ability.  It’s hard to convey the idea that things get more complex as you mature, and simple answers become more and more inadequate for simple questions. This is why when the question is asked, “what sort of games do you like?” I flounder for a succinct answer before throwing up my hands and saying, “I like lots of stuff, but the last time I loved a game was Life is Strange.”

It’s not unusual for me to play a game and have thoughts about it; a big part of the fun for me involves turning over things for a while after I’ve finished experiencing them.  With Life is Strange, it went beyond the normal mulling over; I spent the better part of a month picking apart the game because it gave me feelings.  You know, not just the typical reaction to a story that’s well crafted enough to make you sympathize with its characters but something that evokes a sense of wistfulness that never really comes back in the same way twice.  It’s a game that, among a lot of other things, is about nostalgia and the ineffable sadness that springs from understanding you simply can’t recreate an original experience perfectly. Max Caulfield learns, regardless of what final choice the player makes about Chloe Price’s fate, that there is no going back; her superpower is being able to perfectly relive memories, except she can’t decontextualize them from what she knows about the future.  Even she can’t scratch the itch that nostalgia always leaves as it skitters through our brains. Life is Strange says, quite emphatically, that we’re collectively doomed to chase imperfect facsimiles of cherished past experiences.

Image

Star Wars is not Life is Strange.  It begins with a nobody farm kid discovering he’s heir to a powerful legacy and growing into the power that legacy offers through a series of victories and defeats (but mostly victories).  The scale of the story is massive, the stakes the political future of a galaxy. This is high melodrama we’re dealing with, all fit neatly into a very well trodden story structure. Star Wars is big and flashy and exciting while also being comfortable in a way that can be difficult to explain.  Over the course of the original story arc, following Luke Skywalker from farmboy to Jedi Knight and liberator of the galaxy, the audience gets invited into a classic power fantasy.  There are no moments of small feeling or sitting with slight discomfort or teasing out the nuance of a few exchanged words. Emotions are big and, for the most part, pure. Audiences loved it to such an extent that now all you have to do to call up those thoughts and emotions is mention Star Wars.

Following Life is Strange, Square Enix decided they wanted to publish a prequel.  Life is Strange: Before the Storm has the unenviable task of going back in time to tell us the story that brings Chloe to where she is when she first barges into the bathroom at Blackwell Academy looking to settle a debt with Nathan Prescott.  It introduces us to Rachel Amber, the girl who has left such an indelible impression on everyone in Arcadia Bay with her absence in Life is Strange that her presence could only be a disappointment (and yet it somehow isn’t).  In the predestined frame of tragic death awaiting one or both of these girls, Before the Storm dares to push relentlessly towards the happiness that they so richly deserve regardless of the personal cost.  In a lot of ways it succeeds, although like all prequels this story suffers from knowing what comes next. That the developers felt the need to add a stinger after the game’s final credits reminding you what’s in store for Chloe and Rachel in Life is Strange underlines this fact grossly.  A story that should be about two queer girls finding happiness despite everything being set against them is marred in ways that can’t be avoided because you can’t change what’s past.

Fans of Star Wars have grappled with this problem of prequels for two decades now; a story that they loved got more added to it, but it was done in a way that failed to meet their expectations.  While George Lucas was off chasing his own nostalgia for the movies and serials he grew up with while playing with modern filmmaking technology, the audience was waiting for their nostalgia for Star Wars to be satisfied.  If we can set aside the objective quality of the Prequel Trilogy, what we’re left with is both a creator and his audience discovering in a very rude way the incompatibility of their nostalgias.  Lucas couldn’t recreate the magic of the first movie, so he didn’t try, and fans revolted. Nostalgia became a catalyst for toxicity in the fandom. Anyone who was even vaguely aware of Star Wars fans in the ‘00s knew that a vocal portion of them were bitterly angry with Lucas for failing to deliver on their preferred vision.

Before the Storm, with its push to break new ground in a story about memory, couldn’t be the last word for Chloe and Max.  Nostalgia trips aren’t complete without some return to original form, and there’s too much inversion in the prequel for it to stand alone as a satisfying reprise of what Life is Strange captured; Max and Rachel, eternal foils in Chloe’s mind, have to be put back in their original roles as the respective presence and absence that pull her character in opposite directions.  To close out our time with these characters, we get the bonus episode “Farewell” which serves as a prequel to the entire series.

The whole episode is an extended exercise in fan service and nostalgia for the dynamics that fans of the series loved about Life is Strange.  Max is a little unsure of herself, and Chloe is full of enthusiasm and joy that covers some deep pain about being a social outcast.  The original voice actors (absent from Before the Storm because of a voice actors’ strike that happened during the game’s production) reprise their roles.  The soundtrack reverts from the hard rock that Chloe prefers to the more melancholy folk and indie tracks associated with Max’s perspective.  The side quest is once again Max’s ongoing search for the perfect photo ops. As a player you are supposed to nostalgia trip hard, and for the most part the episode succeeds at getting you there.  The pain and poignancy of the episode revolves entirely around moments of foreshadowing to which Chloe and Max are oblivious while the player absorbs all the tragic import.  Family plans that will be dashed mingle with Max’s ever present misgivings about how she can stay in touch when she’s moving so far away to continually pull the player’s emotional strings.  We get it; this is a last moment of unmitigated happiness for Chloe and Max before the universe starts to punish them for existing. We so appreciate being reminded of all the stuff that these characters suffer while we were growing to love them.

Ultimately, “Farewell” chooses to end in the same spirit as Before the Storm‘s main story: with a gut punch that only hurts because it’s powered by the memory of something that can’t be reclaimed.  If you step away from the investment in the characters for even a moment, it immediately becomes apparent that this story was structured to maximize the emotional manipulation of the player.  Of course the day Max tells Chloe she’s moving away is the same day Chloe’s father dies.  This can’t just be a bittersweet story about friendship promising to endure despite unseen rough waters; it also has to remind us of Life is Strange‘s worst impulses towards traumatizing characters just because it can.  A straightforward reading of the entire series is that the universe hates Chloe Price; the cynical reality is that the developers, who created that universe, don’t hate Chloe so much as see her as a vehicle for delivering measured doses of trauma porn.  They created a character that many players of the game love, and then they exploit that emotional connection to induce sadness in players, the vast majority of whom simply do not have the well of related experiences to be anything but voyeurs.  It’s a cruel trick, but this is a story about nostalgia, and the only way nostalgia can be enjoyed is to not notice its cruelty.

I remember feeling cautiously optimistic about the news that Lucasfilm had sold the rights to Star Wars to Disney.  This was a soulless corporate juggernaut taking over a beloved film series, but at least it was a soulless corporate juggernaut that knew how to make an entertaining movie.  Along came The Force Awakens, and fans were treated to the nostalgia trip they had been craving but George Lucas hadn’t delivered.  It was off, though. Some fans felt like too much was similar (the desert planet, the nobody discovering their heritage, the third iteration on the Death Star) while some (mostly white, male) fans felt things were too different.  Nostalgia found itself in direct conflict with the impetus to do something new. Still, the muddled response to The Force Awakens (after all the initial ecstasy of having a new Star Wars movie that wasn’t terrible wore off) pales in comparison to the anger that The Last Jedi elicited from certain nostalgic fans.

Star Wars The Last Jedi.jpg

Theatrical release poster for The Last Jedi. (Image credit: Wikipedia)

The extremely vocal faction of Star Wars fans who have railed against The Last Jedi are fundamentally upset because they were presented with a story that puts nostalgia in its place as something that’s fleeting and unhealthy to dwell in; they wanted Luke and Leia and Han to remain unchanged despite thirty intervening years.  Their vitriol against a story that dared to make characters change in the same way that people change is entirely fueled by disappointment that their nostalgia wasn’t satisfied. They missed the fact that Han is mostly unchanged when he boards the Millennium Falcon in The Force Awakens: he’s returned to his original state as a shiftless smuggler just trying to stay ahead of the people he owes, and the result of this enforced stasis is that he has an estranged son who ultimately kills him.  Luke, in contrast, is totally disillusioned with the past; he’s seen the havoc that sort of reverie can wreak, and he completely dismisses the glory days as unsuitable for dealing with the present. The legend of Luke Skywalker is an illusion that’s only good for a distraction.  The new Star Wars trilogy, as far as it’s gone, says quite emphatically that enshrining the past over adapting to the present will cause heartache.  Nostalgia indulged uncritically on a massive enough scale will turn from a small cruelty into a large hatred.

And of course nostalgia is cruel.  The promise of a return to something simpler and more pure and joyful is so incredibly seductive as we grow more complicated and uncertain and jaded by our experience of the world, but it inevitably disappoints.  You can’t go back, and the longer it takes you to come to terms with that fact, the more nostalgia twists the knife. We become Max, caught between an irreclaimable past and a painful, destructive present that we didn’t really have a hand in making but we do have a responsibility to help make bearable.  

The confounding thing about this position is just how frequently we seem to get trapped in it.  Yes, the wistfulness and the reverie are appealing, but they also hurt.  The big question seems to be whether the pain associated with nostalgia gets directed inward towards the person experiencing it or outward towards others.  Neither direction seems especially healthy, and it leaves one wondering why we continue to collectively indulge in nostalgia at all. We seem to be addicted to this thing that we’re only capable of weaponizing in order to torture each other in our endless interaction with story.  It feels untenable, but in the long run it probably won’t change in any meaningful way; people are remarkably stubborn when it comes to holding on to the past.

So I Just Saw Solo: A Star Wars Story

The first thought I had when I heard that the Han Solo movie was coming out in May was that it must not be very good if Disney was interrupting the Christmas release schedule it had maintained for the previous three Star Wars movies.  The second thought was an observation from this old cinema deconstruction/serial killer fiction series that some friends introduced me to many years ago (if you’ve heard of Mr. Plinkett, then congratulations on your internet literacy; have some pizza rolls to celebrate) which went like this: all other blunders of the prequel trilogy aside, at least there was no attempt to shoehorn Han Solo into a story that really didn’t need a character like him, especially a precocious child version like the prequels’ timeline would have demanded.  Better to keep Han as a character who comes on stage fully formed instead of tinkering with an origin story.

Needless to say, I didn’t see Solo when it was in theaters.

Solo: A Star Wars Story Poster

Promotional poster for Solo. (Image credit: IMDb)

Instead, I waited until it came to Netflix and passed a lazy holiday afternoon enjoying some low stakes adventure fare.  I didn’t have any real expectations for the movie, so I was surprised to find that I actually enjoyed it a lot.  If you approach this film with the understanding that there is no good reason for it to exist besides “Disney wants to keep milking Star Wars” then you can expect to have a good time.  The character beats of Han’s arc mostly work, and the set pieces are individually really fun.  There’s lots of stuff that harks back to the space western feel of the first Star Wars (Han and his first crew of misfits literally rob a train while wearing heavy dusters and twirling their blasters on their fingers) without getting bogged down in any of the melodrama of the Jedi stuff that preoccupies both the prequels and the new trilogy.  This is a straightforward story about how a scoundrel becomes a scoundrel, and while every beat in that journey feels like gratuitous fan service, every beat in the story feels like gratuitous fan service.  I mean, the big emotional moment of the movie (after the action sequence that really should have been the climax instead of just the end of the second act) revolves around Han shooting first, and at the same time that I was groaning about how obvious it was I was also laughing at such a succinct encapsulation of where this character is supposed to be when the credits roll.

For all the fun that it brings with it, Solo is not a perfect film.  There are some pacing issues, particularly with the final act, that could have been better handled.  I’m annoyed with the trend in recent blockbusters to have a perfectly serviceable climax with an obvious resolution point at the end of the middle act followed by an additional half hour of stuff that, no matter its self contained quality as a story, always feels tacked on.  In Solo, we see Han and crew pull off a successful heist capped with Han piloting the Millennium Falcon through extremely dangerous space (successfully completing the infamous Kessel Run in twelve parsecs); this would be a great place to end it as Han and Chewbacca have established themselves as figures in the galactic underworld who have a slightly heroic streak, but instead we get a third act where Han’s love interest whom everyone who knows Star Wars understands will in no way be with him by the movie’s end does some betrayal stuff and there’s a convoluted triple cross involving Han inadvertently using his earnings from the heist to jump start the Rebellion (ugh).  It’s too much in too little time, and the only thing I wonder about the whole decision to go with this ending is that there might not have been much confidence that Solo would warrant a sequel (I guess that was actually pretty good forecasting) and so the character needed to land much closer to where he is when he shows up in the cantina than the still relatively idealistic kid who makes that big score on Kessel.

It’s a shame about the lack of a sequel too, because for all the pacing missteps with the ending, there are a lot of story hooks that I would love to see followed up on.  Maybe I just need to read more Star Wars comics.

So I Just Saw Star Wars: The Last Jedi Again

And it was just as good the second time!

I don’t have a lot in the way of new thoughts to add about The Last Jedi, but I wanted to touch on a couple of things I noticed on the second viewing.

Obviously, I’ll be discussing spoilers for Star Wars: The Last Jedi.

Before Rachael and I went to do our second viewing, we re-watched The Force Awakens since neither of us had seen it in its entirety since it first came out in theaters a couple years ago.  That’s still a really good movie as well, and after we watched it, Rachael and I came to the conclusion that much of what The Last Jedi does actually works in concert with what was set up in The Force Awakens instead of just tearing it down (a friend of ours pointed out that it’s silly to think of these two movies as working in opposition since JJ Abrams, the director for The Force Awakens, continues to be involved in the current trilogy’s production and will be directing Episode IX).  Rey, Finn, and Poe have their core characteristics established in the earlier film, and the understanding we have of them there informs how they’ll behave and fail in the second movie.  Before embracing her role in the Resistance, Rey is obsessed with staying on Jakku so she can be reunited with her parents; in The Last Jedi she learns with pretty strong finality that her parents abandoned her for no good reason and they’re most likely dead.  Finn’s set up as a guy who just wants to escape from the terrible life he’s been press ganged into, and he spends all of The Force Awakens trying to get away until his friendship with Rey drives him to do something stupid and heroic; when we follow him in the second movie, we see that he’s still acting selfishly, and it’s the realization that he can contribute to something bigger than himself in the form of the Resistance that generates a true change of heart.  Poe’s established as the hotshot pilot who is most valuable to the cause as a guy who can blow stuff up and pull off the risky missions; when we come back to him in The Last Jedi we get a clearer picture of Poe’s failure to recognize the human cost of his heroics and his feelings of impotence when stuck without an X-wing.  Everything about The Force Awakens sets up why we should like and sympathize with these characters, then The Last Jedi examines our assumptions about why we valorize the way they act in the process of helping them grow past their faults (it’s also in The Last Jedi where our three heroes more fully embrace the archetypal roles they’re inheriting from the original trilogy’s three heroes; Rey is the initially naive but immensely talented bumpkin, Finn is the scoundrel who learns to commit to something bigger than himself, and Poe is the inspirational leader of the movement).

At the same time that our heroes get deconstructed in ways that only make sense in the context of The Force Awakens, our villain grows more complex and sympathetic.  Kylo Ren is… not an impressive character in Abrams’s film.  Yes, he’s powerful, but he’s also clearly trying way too hard to live up to a legacy that doesn’t fit him well.  We’re given the impression that Kylo is supposed to be Darth Vader redux, both in the popular imagination and within the Star Wars universe, but he just… isn’t.  He’s petulant, impulsive, and, honestly, kind of whiny; while these are certainly traits that we associate with Anakin Skywalker in his youth (thanks for that, George Lucas), they don’t evoke the specter of Darth Vader.  The Last Jedi helps us understand why Kylo Ren feels like such a poor imitation; he’s suffocating under the assumption that he must live up to the reputation of his family heritage.  The Skywalkers decided the fate of the galaxy for two generations, and Kylo’s mentor in the Dark Side, Supreme Leader Snoke, clearly intends to make it three for three.  Of course, Snoke doesn’t care a whit about Kylo Ren’s appropriation of past icons, and this dismissal all that, summed up with the early scene in The Last Jedi where Snoke derides him for continuing to wear a helmet that he doesn’t need in homage to his grandfather, serves to drive Kylo Ren towards the decision to burn the past away and make something new just for himself.  Just like the heroes’ journeys through failure and better understanding of themselves, Kylo Ren realizes that he will be more satisfied with himself if he stops trying to imitate what’s come before; of course, his realization is accompanied by a violent coup of the First Order, but he is the trilogy’s villain.

Beyond the characters arcs, I just generally enjoyed the way the movie was put together.  The timeline of events make sense to me (I’ll stand by the idea that everything happens in the same twenty-four hour period; Rey’s plot begins perhaps a few hours earlier than the evacuation of the Resistance base at the beginning of the movie, and by the end of the first full day she’s on Ahch-To she’s on her way to help the fleet out), and the Canto Bight sequence still strikes me as delightful.  None of it feels indulgent to me, because it’s the crux of Finn’s arc; he can’t reach the point of being okay with self sacrifice for the Resistance without first understanding why the Resistance fights against the First Order (illustrated in the abuse of the underclass on Canto Bight) and without being on the receiving end of a selfish betrayal himself by DJ the codebreaker.  Luke’s Force projection of himself is a delightful thing on second viewing, because there are all kinds of little cues like the fact that his hair is cut and there’s no gray in his beard to signal that we’re not looking at the same Skywalker that Rey spent a day with.  It’s even better when you realize that the idealized self image Luke projects also serves the purpose of giving the remainder of the Resistance the legend they’ve been holding on to hope for.  It’s pretty nifty.

My one gripe is a really minor one, but I’m still bugged by the fact that during Luke’s showdown with Kylo Ren, Poe looks on and calls Luke by his first name.  Dude, you’ve never met Luke Skywalker before; you are not on a first name basis with one of the greatest heroes of the Rebellion.  The line feels like a slip in tone, and I’m still bothered by it.

It’s unlikely that I’m going to go see The Last Jedi for a third time in theaters, but it’s still such a good movie that I’m certainly looking forward to giving it another watch in the future.

So I Just Saw Star Wars: The Force Awakens

I saw Star Wars: The Force Awakens on opening night.

It was an 11 p.m. showing, and I got home about 1:30 in the morning, and I had to get up at 5:30 for work the next day, and none of this matters because I saw Star Wars: The Force Awakens on opening night, and it was fantastic.

Yeah, it’s basically a reboot of A New Hope. A New Hope is also objectively the second best Star Wars movie, so why would you complain about that? (Image credit: Wookieepedia)

As someone who happily got infected with the Star Wars nostalgia bug as a child (I remember my dad trying to sell me on the first movie while we were in a video store when I was six or seven by talking up Luke’s flying car; as someone who’s never been a gearhead, I’ve always wondered why the go to feature wasn’t laser swords, but that’s neither here nor there), I’ve been waiting for this event for the majority of my life.  Even though I’m a millennial, I’m a total original trilogy fanboy, and I never had the opportunity to see any of those movies in a theater.  Return of the Jedi came out two years before I was born, and because of a fit of stubbornness in 1997 when the special editions first came out, I never saw those (my mom said I had to clean my room before I could go see Star Wars, and to my twelve-year-old mind it was more important to have the moral victory of not cleaning my room).  I did see all of the prequel movies in theaters (I think I even saw Attack of the Clones twice; I was in high school, and high schoolers have terrible taste in movies; don’t judge me), but those can hardly be counted considering that everyone recognizes that they’re just not good movies.  No, my Star Wars is the one with Luke, Leia, and Han, and I made it thirty years before I saw a Star Wars movie in theaters.

But we’re not here to discuss the odd chimera that is my millennial adoration for a decidedly baby boomerish phenomenon.  We’re here to talk about the movie.

Obviously, spoilers for Star Wars: The Force Awakens follow.

Let’s just get the gushing bits out of the way first, because by the time this post goes live there will have been tons of gushing.  It feels obligatory at this point, almost as much as the frantic search for things to nitpick and critique about the movie feel obligatory as people move past the initial relief that yes, it didn’t suck lemons.

Random gushy things:

 

  • Poe Dameron has the best hair.  The first shot where we meet him at the film’s start is magical simply because he’s sporting some incredible feathered ‘do with magnificent sideburns that feels like a natural progression of galactic fashion since Luke’s moptop  (on an unrelated note, Oscar Isaac has probably taken the place of Ewan McGregor as that one actor in Star Wars I’d consider making out with if given the opportunity).
  • One of the random stormtroopers is voiced by a woman.  Yeah, people have been making a big deal that that one stormtrooper in the really funny scene where Rey figures out the Jedi Mind Trick was played by Daniel Craig, but the significant thing here is that in addition to learning that stormtroopers consist of more than just white dudes since the clone army was discontinued, we also learn that the grunts have women in the ranks.  It was a throwaway line, but I loved it.
  • Finn’s arc as a stormtrooper who suddenly develops a conscience on his first combat assignment works really well for me.  I liked the nods to the idea that stormtroopers are abducted and indoctrinated from childhood to be unquestioningly obedient to the First Order (that’s a detail pulled from the old Expanded Universe by the way, for anyone who’s keeping score), and the recognition that this process isn’t totally full proof (an officer makes an offhand remark that Finn will probably just need to be referred for reeducation since it’s his first offense, which implies that this break with conditioning isn’t as absurdly rare as some people might speculate).  That Finn would be brought face to face with the kind of violence he’s supposed to do on a regular basis and recoil with horror really worked for me; even though we see Finn engaging in some heroics against other stormtroopers later, that underlying current of reluctance to even be involved in fighting is a nice through-line for his character.  Also, his misguided attempts to rescue Rey when she clearly doesn’t need it are adorable.
  • For that matter, Rey never needs rescuing, and both of the times when she does get in real trouble, Finn’s attempts to save her are proven to be kind of ill-conceived.  I love that Rey breaks herself out of prison on Starkiller Base, and I don’t care about any arguments that try to explain why her awesomeness is implausible.  She’s our hero for this new trilogy, and given that Star Wars is space opera in the vein of Flash Gordon and Buck Rogers, I think it’s perfectly acceptable for the hero to be over-the-top awesome.
  • C-3PO is the most annoying character in the movie, and that’s the way it should be.
  • Luke doesn’t have a single line, and I don’t care because Mark Hamill sells wise space wizard so hard in his one scene (also, I love the detail that he doesn’t hide his cyborg hand anymore; it’s a good visual cue that he’s at peace with what he is after all the turmoil he goes through in Return of the Jedi).

Some observations about the movie’s details:

  • Lightsabers are used sparingly, and when they appear there’s an emotional weight to their use (also, I never realized how much lightsabers actually casting light on their surroundings would improve the way they look).  This is a nice contrast to the prequel trilogy, where it was decided that what everybody loved was the laser swords, so let’s have laser swords in every scene regardless of whether they’re necessary (I mean, go all the way back to the first scene of The Phantom Menace with Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan; they sense a disturbance and their first reaction is to pull out their lightsabers; as an old man Obi-Wan only draws his weapon when he has to in order to protect Luke or when he’s confronted by Vader; random non-Sith threats don’t rate a laser sword, so their appearance lets you know things are serious).
  • Han Solo plays the role of Obi-Wan to Rey’s Luke, and the story beats have more depth knowing Han’s history.  I loved seeing Han in a mentor role here, even if it did mean that his death at Kylo Ren’s hands was inevitable (as soon as I saw Ren out on the catwalk with Han hurrying to confront him, I knew it couldn’t end well for the old guy).  I think it was particularly poignant to have Han redeliver Obi-Wan’s explanation of the Force after his extreme skepticism in A New Hope (it was also a nice extension from Han’s reluctant acceptance of the Force’s existence after seeing Obi-Wan and Luke in action as fully realized Jedi).
  • When people compare Captain Phasma to Boba Fett, they are being remarkably accurate: lots of hype outside the movie, doesn’t really do that much in the movie.  Of course, I know that it’s been pointed out that Phasma will have a larger role in Episode VIII, and I’m cool with that for now, but I think it’s important to remember that Boba Fett was also a character that a lot of people got excited about when he was first introduced.  Then he got knocked into a sarlacc pit by a blind guy.  Let’s hope that Phasma doesn’t has her own sarlacc waiting for her in the future.

Okay, let’s move on to some more in-depth discussions now.

On the axes of female and person-of-color representation, this film’s doing significantly better than a lot of comparable action movie fare.  In a cast of nine major humanoid characters (I’m not counting Luke or the droids since his appearance is more of a cameo, and even though we generally read droids as male, they’re really nongendered), there are four women and three people of color.  Those ratios aren’t bad, and when you exclude the legacy characters from the original trilogy they get even better (without Han, Leia, and Chewbacca it becomes a cast of three men and three women, and three white people and three people of color).  The gender parity is fantastic (though the obvious push from here is to work towards including nonbinary and genderqueer actors as well), but the racial diversity, while an improvement, could still be better.  As amazing as Poe Dameron and Maz Kanata are, they’re really minor characters in comparison to Rey and Finn, and in Maz’s case, her actress Lupita Nyong’o is hidden behind CG.  Considering that many people overlook Oscar Isaac as a person of color (he’s originally from Guatemala), that just leaves John Boyega to do most of the heavy lifting, and it’s a very awkward scenario to be the only black man in the galaxy (this is exaggerated a little bit; I don’t remember specifically, but I want to say that people of color do appear as background characters throughout, which is definitely appreciated).  Nyong’o’s situation leaves me feeling rather ambivalent, since she’s really great as Maz, but I also can’t help but remember that the last black actor who played a significant nonhuman in Star Wars was Ahmed Best–we don’t remember his character too fondly at all.  Nonetheless, the big issue with the ratio of white people to people of color is simply that the ratio won’t be satisfactory until white stops being treated like a default and people of color are placed into a single catch-all representational group.

Now let’s discuss Kylo Ren, because he is the most delightful villain in all of villainy.  In a move that seems to me to be the absolute best meta-joke ever, we learn that Kylo Ren, who is obviously a marketing attempt at giving the audience someone as iconic as Darth Vader for the new trilogy, is motivated by a desire to emulate his hero, and he’s actually really bad at it.  Ren throws multiple tantrums, whines about the fact that becoming a true master of the Dark Side requires him to kill his father, and he wears a helmet that he doesn’t even need to survive.  The big reveal that Ren is totally unscathed underneath his mask is such a wonderful anticlimax because it lets us know that this guy really doesn’t understand what made Vader so scary, while also giving us a glimpse of what Anakin Skywalker should have been like in the prequel trilogy.  Ren comes across as a kid who’s honestly never been challenged his whole life, and that’s left him with a huge ego that can’t handle the small failures he suffers throughout the film’s runtime.  When Rey comes along and demonstrates that she’s his peer even though she hasn’t had any Force training at all, he just comes unhinged in the most entertaining way.  The fact that he still has considerable raw power helps him remain threatening, and the specter of what he could become after completing his training with Supreme Leader Snoke and actually learning the secret to Vader’s power (seething rage channeled through iron willed self control) leaves me with high hopes for what we’ll see of him in the rest of this trilogy.  Besides that, I also love the subtext of Rey and Ren’s relationship where Ren is the entitled guy who is furious that he’s being beaten by a girl.

Speaking of Rey, I’m going to call it now that she’s not Han and Leia’s daughter (again, I have Expanded Universe stuff bouncing around in my head, and I couldn’t help thinking that she was supposed to be Ben Solo’s twin; it wasn’t until I later read that Kylo Ren is supposed to be around thirty while Rey is no more than nineteen so they can’t possibly be twins; he acts so immaturely that I read him as much younger) despite the movie’s extensive pains to show that Rey has a ton of parallels with Han.  It’s possible that she’s related to Luke somehow, but I think there’s a strong possibility that she has no connection to the Skywalker line at all; the special specialness of the Skywalkers was George Lucas’s thing, and considering that Anakin effectively succeeded in resetting the balance between Jedi and Sith when he killed the Emperor and left Luke as the only known trained Force user in the galaxy (as a young man Luke was a lot more influenced by the Dark Side than he cared to admit), there’s no real narrative imperative for the next generation of heroes to center around another Skywalker.  I’ll be happy either way, but the direction they go with Rey’s parentage will do a lot to determine Star Wars‘s broad thematic interest in the notion of legacies and generational sagas for a specific family.

And one last thing to ponder:  Han and Chewbacca have been friends for decades at this point, and Han’s never asked to try out Chewie’s bowcaster before?

Some Stuff That’s Nifty (5/4/14)

I nearly had to climb in a dumpster this past week to save a football.  Fortunately, it didn’t come to that.  Still, I’m ready to declare DumpsterGate 2014 the best work-related story of the year.

Faith

The Pope's Audience Hall Looks Like A Final Fantasy Boss Fight

La Resurrezione by Pericle Fazzini. The sculpture stands behind the chair of the Pope in the Paul VI Audience Hall at the Vatican. (Image credit: Kotaku)

1. Richard Beck commemorates Yom HaShoah this week with a post from 2008 about a visit he made to the Buchenwald labor camp.

2. Also from Richard Beck: “This is why, in my estimation, many progressive Christians, despite their focus on social justice, still struggle with being kind, gentle, forgiving and loving human beings. If you aren’t attending to the affections in your pursuit of social justice you’re prone to becoming harsh, angry and judgmental. Or just burnt out. Joy rather than righteous indignation has to be what carries you forward.”

3. Matthew Vines is getting a lot of press lately since he published his new book God and the Gay Christian.  I’ve not read it, but from what I hear, it’s a good book for people who still feel the tension between holding a high view of Scripture (that you just can’t ignore when the Bible condemns something) and being gay affirming.  Vines identifies as a traditional evangelical, and he argues his case from that position.  His original lecture, which I watched a few years ago, was very helpful for me to begin exploring my own thoughts on gay people and the Church.  I’m very hopeful that his book gets traction in the evangelical community and it does some good there.

4. Candida Moss offers a brief review of a new book on the history of the tradition of Peter being the first Pope of the Catholic Church.  Early Church history is not something that I study extensively, but glimpses like this one always seem to pique my interest.

5. Zach Hoag on some pitfalls that come with the American, post-evangelical appeal to grace.  Hoag makes a good point about being wary of grace leaving us in a position to enable others to continue doing harmful things.  It’s a difficult line to walk.

6. At Theoblogy, a guest post from Rabbi Joseph Edelheit condemning a recent video that was produced by Jews for Jesus that depicts Jesus as a victim of the Holocaust.  Edelheit’s writing is pretty raw, and some of the comments criticize his harshness, but in this case I think it’s important to remember that this is a case of a Christian group co-opting the Holocaust for the sake of prosletyzing to Jews.  That’s bad evangelism.

7. This critique of the attitude behind the recent movie God’s Not Dead gets at something I’ve been saying for a while, although it’s done in a way that’s much more snappy and readable.  God, by definition, is a supernatural being, and experiences of him in the physical world are unprovable.  It’s vacuous to argue for or against his existence, even though so many things in popular culture seem bound on that exact course.

8. Al Mohler’s also been getting some attention for writing an op-ed where he argues that supporting the death penalty is a morally justifiable position for a Christian to take.  Here are Zack Hunt and Jason Micheli explaining why that’s absurd.

9. For blog host Patheos’s fifth anniversary, they’ve asked their various bloggers to compile lists of their top five posts.  Fred Clark just published his collection yesterday, and he links to some really good stuff.  Better yet, he asks for feedback from his commenters, who form a very lively community, and they have tons of recommendations as well.  I’ve been a fan of Fred’s for a little over a year now, I think, and this is a great collection of his work.

Feminism

1. Bill O’Reilly’s not clueless.  I think he is a total cad though.  Here’s his latest bit of dog whistling to get his audience all frothed up over a celebrity they probably don’t really care about because she happens to perform songs that contain positive messages about sex.  Take note of how, in O’Reilly’s estimation, this is a problem that uniquely affects the Black community, regardless of what statistics about teen pregnancy say.

2. A follow up from Slate about the story from last week regarding the kidnapped girls in Niger.  This article gives a pretty good overview of what the terrorist group who kidnapped the girls, Boko Haram, wants to do, and why we should care about this stuff.  Also, as a side note, remember that some of the girls escaped from their captors.  None have been rescued.

3. I want to be a traitor to the mens.  Thanks Scalzi!

Fiction

1. So Disney owns Star Wars now.  They will be releasing new Star Wars movies in the near future.  I feel positively disposed towards this fact, because I know that Disney is in the business of making money and producing entertainment that has broad demographic appeal.  Whatever Episode VII ends up being, I doubt it will match the craptitude(tm) of the Prequel Trilogy.  Of course, this also means that the Expanded Universe post-Return of the Jedi is getting pretty much completely annulled.  I actually read a lot of books in the EU when I was a kid, and I enjoyed them.  All the stuff that Phil Owen discusses in this article more or less went over my head at the time (and I didn’t stick around long enough to read any of the books that take place more than ten years after the Battle of Endor).  I suppose for more dedicated fans of the EU it’s a bittersweet thing to see it decanonized for the forthcoming movies, but I prefer to think of it as simply an alternate continuity.  The new Star Wars movies will probably be original stories, but I’m guessing there’s going to be a generous share of adaptations from all that source material.

2. In a similar vein, here’s the announced cast list for Episode VII.  And here’s a series of articles dealing with the fallout that comes from having only one new female character in a franchise that has no reason to be bound by contemporary gender politics (see that article about what the Expanded Universe did to see what I’m talking about).  Maybe I should rethink my placid confidence that the new Stars Wars movies will be okay.

3. Bob Hoskins passed away this week.  To commemorate his talent as an actor, here’s a video of raw footage from Who Framed Roger Rabbit? showing Hoskins acting against blue screen running parallel to the finished scene.

Fun

1. I’m a fan of Parks and Recreation.  It’s like a much happier version of The Office, but without all the jerks.  Folks who follow the show probably know that season 6 ended with a three year time skip into the future.  That’s always a risky thing for a show that’s been so grounded in current pop culture to do.  On the other hand, we’re seeing Parks and Recreation move into a speculative mode where the show will be doing a little bit of very immediate futurism.  Since the show’s already comfortable with suspending reality for the sake of comedy, I think this will work out fine.

2. Forced perspective chalk drawings are always fun.  So is the classic time wasting game Snake (I know I spent my share of Algebra classes playing snake on my calculator instead of paying attention).  Here’s something that combines the two, although the comments on this article indicate that this is an old thing from the internet.  Well, it’s the first time I’ve seen it, and it might be for you too, so enjoy it!

3. Maybe I’m just desensitized to hyperbole on the internet, but Buzzfeed style headlines have never really bothered me much.  However, if they bother you then there’s a plugin to help with that.  Of course, fogeys like myself prefer to just add snark the old-fashioned way–with our minds.

4. Have some very well done Batman cosplay.

5. Conservation of ninjutsu indeed.

6. Okay, so maybe the problem with Star Wars movies being so male-centric has to do with the fact that they’re all actually bees.

Gaming

1. I don’t play dating sims, but I thought this was a very thoughtful article about how a genre that’s so mechanically different from the types of games that are popular among Western audiences could offer some new insights into how to advance the medium beyond experiences that focus on competition and violence.

2. Also, here’s an article about why The Wolf Among Us, the episodic adventure game from TellTale Games that’s based on Bill Willingham’s Fables comic series, is basically a stealth dating sim.

Science

1. The universe is a big place.  Enjoy some pictures of it.

2. I want to live in an algae tent someday.

Superheroes

1. A visual history of Spider-Man’s costumes over the decades.  There’s been a surprising amount of variation (especially in recent years) for a character who’s look is pretty iconic.

Miscellaneous

1. Here’s an essay from 2010 discussing the ideological make up of the Tea Party movement.  It’s an interesting analysis that I think does a pretty good job of pinpointing the weird mishmash of conservative and libertarian values that inform the movement’s members.  Also, the importance of karma as an ideal to aspire towards strikes me as pretty insightful.  It’d be nice if folks considered that karma’s also not a terribly Christian ideal (I’m pretty confident it’s a universal value among Christians that people should always get better than what they deserve; we call that grace).

2. I’ve been getting inundated with banner ads for the past few weeks advertising John Oliver’s new comedy news show, Last Week Tonight, that premiered on HBO last Sunday.  HBO, in their infinite magnanimity, put the first episode on Youtube for free.  I enjoyed it.  I’m not going to buy an HBO subscription to watch it regularly, but where it’s freely available, I’ll tune in.  The segment on the national election in India was very informative, and the bit about ridiculous food advertising was quite good too.  Also, Oliver’s response to the Pop Tarts commercial was excellent and spot on.  Eating sugary foods for breakfast doesn’t help my students rise and shine; it just encourages them to punch each other relentlessly before 8:30 in the morning.

Some Stuff That’s Nifty 7/28/13

Let’s see what’s going on!

Religion

1. There has been a lot of good stuff coming out of Defeating the Dragons this week.  It’s hard to pick just one article that I really liked, so I’m going to link a couple.  ForgedImagination’s writing about her struggles breaking away from a fundamentalist branch of the Church are incredibly moving.  Here’s one about her experiences with the toxic effects of modesty culture, and here’s another where she discusses her difficulty even setting foot in a church these days.

2. In a similar vein, Morgan Guyton at Mercy Not Sacrifice has been churning out a ton of good material this week.  He’s discussed the nature of the gospel as an open invitation to a party instead of a get out of hell free card, what it means to participate in a Church that is “exclusively for the excluded,” posted an open letter to an atheist that he hopes to begin a dialogue with (there’s discussion of Slavoj Zizek), and offered up a meditation on how the doctrine of utter depravity is better interpreted as utter providence.

3. From Richard Beck at Experimental Theology, a rumination on hopeful belief versus dogmatic belief framed in the context of the question of what the Christian afterlife looks like.  Beck calls himself a hopeful universalist, and makes a good point about the reality that faith consists of a certain amount of doubt, and so certainty is not something that’s helpful to throw into the equation. Also from Beck, a paper he presented at a conference on Christian ethics back in June which discusses the connection between Christianity and anarchism.

4. I read Fred Clark at Slacktivist regularly.  He’s a very harsh critic of the religious right, and sometimes with good reason.  Here’s a critique he recently wrote pointing out how the purity culture that parts of the Church participate in creates a bizarre climate where ideological extremism only exists in one direction.

5. I’m so happy that Rachel Held Evans is back from vacation now.  She’s the reasonable bridge builder in my regular diet of Christian bloggers.  This week she wrote a thoughtful post about how anger is a useful tool for spurring action, but a hindrance in maintaining a clear vision.  Also, because she blogs for CNN now, she wrote a great article there discussing the reason that people are becoming disillusioned with the modern evangelical branch of the Church.

Comics

Kitty Pryde

Kitty Pryde (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

1. Over at Beyond the Gamer, XmenXpert posted a nifty list of five superheroes in the Marvel universe who haven’t been made into Avengers yet, but really should be.  Kitty Pryde tops the list, which why not, seeing as she did single-handedly save the Earth from a giant bullet by phasing it through the planet.  Honestly, if you’re a hero in the Marvel universe and you save the whole world all by yourself, that should be an instant Avenger card right there.

Science

1. Magnets are a lot of fun.  Magnets used to make ferrofluids do interesting things with their structure is more fun than that.

2. Rachael and I saw Waking Life this week (in what I’m calling the slowest movie line-up of the summer), and while I thought it was strange, it did ask some interesting questions about the nature of dreaming.  If you haven’t seen it, then it might be worth your time; just don’t expect any comprehensible plot, since the entire two hour film seems to be mostly a simulation of a dream.  To help you figure out what that’s supposed to mean, here’s a list of ten theories on the nature of dreaming.

3. So, leave it to a bunch of Germans to freeze light for a minute.  “This light moves too quickly!  We must stop it so we can optimize its efficiency!”

4. I’m not sure this is exactly what they were talking about in Inception, but it’s an interesting avenue of research.  I’m curious to see what comes of memory implantation (one person in the comments mentioned that this could have profound effects on treating Alzheimer’s if it eventually led to being able to implant a person’s lost memories).

5. I listened to an audiobook a few years ago that was set in the near future where everyone had these weird silver glove things that worked like a cell phone.  They were fully flexible, and people just kind of stuffed the gloves in their pockets until they needed to make a call, then they pulled the rumpled little thing out, put it on, and got connected.  The first step to getting those gloves is this stuff here.

6. “We all love cephalopods!”

7. We actually get yellow skies like this in Georgia on occasion, though never with the awesome cloud formations.  Rachael and I used to joke that maybe it was the world ending; apparently we weren’t the only ones thinking that.

8. A quote from Rosalind Franklin, who discovered the double-helix structure of DNA, about the importance of allowing science and everyday life to intersect as much and often as possible.

Gaming

1. I don’t have a smartphone.  If I did, I doubt I’d try to do this with it.  “You died of the plague, roll a new character.”

2. I haven’t played this game, but the trailer looks good.  It’s a point and click adventure about a woman who’s nine months pregnant, in jail, and suspected of murdering her cellmate.  Also, it’s free.

3. Chrono Trigger is, objectively, one of the best games ever made.  I own it on three different platforms because no matter how many times it gets re-released, I always want to play it again.  This tribute makes me all nostalgic, and also leaves me wondering if Square Enix will ever do an HD update.  Check it out.

4. When you stop and think about it, you realize that the play cycle on Donkey Kong really was pretty short.  So short, in fact, that one guy with way too much time on his hands did a play-through of all three levels using stop motion photography and beads.

Movies

1. I feel very ambivalent towards the X-Men movies.  Even the ones that are generally considered good aren’t perfect.  Also, like any action movie, there are always plot holes.  For your consideration, a series of videos enumerating all the problems that were in the first three X-Men movies.

Current Events

1. Via MaddowBlog, an article discussing the recent trend in conservative policy toward instituting prison reform as a cost-saving measure.  Personally, I think this is a wonderful move on the part of the conservatives, because it holds true to the conservative ideal of fiscal responsibility while doing something that really will be of benefit to society as a whole.

2. From The Next New Deal, an article reviewing the libertarian model proposed by Robert Nozick in his book Anarchy, State, and Utopia.  I am not a libertarian, so I won’t say that this is a good critique of libertarianism writ large, but it puts the model that Nozick promotes in a very different, very harsh light.  If I have any libertarian readers, would you care to comment on this?

What the Heck, China?!

1. A man in China has a pet turtle whom he gives cigarettes to.  The turtle is a nicotine addict.  This is very sad, because I love turtles.

The Internet is for Sharing

1. Kotaku links to a Reddit thread where people are posting comparisons between Game of Thrones and Star Wars.  It’s Reddit, so you’ve probably already seen it, but I live under a rock and found it novel, so here it is.  Obviously, it contains spoilers for both franchises.

And that’s it from my little corner of the internet.